Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- The libsql config now hardcodes `url: 'file:./database.db'` for both `LibSQLStore` and `LibSQLVector` and removes `process.env.TURSO_DATABASE_URL`/`vectors.db`, which changes deployment behavior and eliminates configurability; consider keeping the env-based URLs (and separate vector DB if intentional) while still adding the new retry options.
- In `Navbar`, the second "Admin"/"Workflows" link still has `href="/chat/admin"` but its active-state condition checks `pathname === '/chat/workflows'`, so the visual state and destination can diverge—align the href and pathname checks to the same route.
- For `PolygonCryptoSnapshotsCard`, the loading/title text and downloaded filename no longer include the symbol, which makes the UI and exported data less informative when working with multiple symbols; consider incorporating the symbol back into the label and filename.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location path="src/mastra/config/libsql.ts" line_range="13-17" />
<code_context>
     id: 'libsql-storage',
-    url: process.env.TURSO_DATABASE_URL ?? 'file:./database.db',
-    authToken: process.env.TURSO_AUTH_TOKEN,
+    url:  'file:./database.db',
+    maxRetries: 5, // Optional retry configuration for transient errors
+    initialBackoffMs: 100, // Initial backoff for retries
+    //disableInit: process.env.DB_DISABLE_INIT === 'true', // Disable auto-init if specified
+    authToken: process.env.TURSO_AUTH_TOKEN, // Optional: for Turso cloud databases
+    // Additional options can be added here as needed
 })
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Using a hard-coded local DB URL ignores TURSO_DATABASE_URL and may break cloud deployments.

Previously the URL only fell back to `file:./database.db` when `TURSO_DATABASE_URL` was unset. Now it always uses the local file path even if the env var is provided, while still passing an auth token, so Turso cloud or other remote setups will silently hit the wrong DB. Please restore the `process.env.TURSO_DATABASE_URL ?? 'file:./database.db'` pattern (or similar) so remote deployments continue to work.
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 2
<location path="app/components/navbar.tsx" line_range="268-269" />
<code_context>
                                             <Link
-                                                href="/chat/admin"
-                                                className={`flex items-center gap-3 rounded-sm p-2 text-sm ${pathname === '/chat/admin' ? 'bg-red-500/10 shadow-sm' : 'hover:bg-red-500/5'}`}
+                                                href="/chat/workflows"
+                                                className={`flex items-center gap-3 rounded-sm p-2 text-sm ${pathname === '/chat/workflows' ? 'bg-red-500/10 shadow-sm' : 'hover:bg-red-500/5'}`}
                                             >
                                                 <svg
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**issue (bug_risk):** Updated link target to `/chat/workflows`, but the mobile/admin link below still points to `/chat/admin`.

On this mobile/admin link, the `href` still points to `/chat/admin` while the active state uses `pathname === '/chat/workflows'`. This will highlight for workflows but navigate to admin. Please make the `href` and pathname check consistent (likely both `/chat/workflows`).
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 3
<location path="src/components/ai-elements/tools/polygon-tools.tsx" line_range="389-396" />
<code_context>
+  if (!output) {return <LoadingCard title="Fetching crypto snapshots" icon={<Loader2 className="size-4 animate-spin" />} />}
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion:** Removing the symbol from the loading and title text may reduce clarity when multiple symbols are used.

Including the symbol in the loading title (as before with `(input as any).symbol`) helps users distinguish which asset a snapshot belongs to when multiple are requested. If the symbol is available here, consider keeping it in the title (e.g., `Crypto Snapshots: BTC-USD`) while still improving the wording, so each card is clearly tied to its symbol.

Suggested implementation:

```typescript
  if (errorText) {return <ErrorCard title="Crypto Snapshots Failed" message={errorText} />}
  if (!output) {
    const symbol = (input as any)?.symbol
    return (
      <LoadingCard
        title={symbol ? `Fetching Crypto Snapshots: ${symbol}` : 'Fetching Crypto Snapshots'}
        icon={<Loader2 className="size-4 animate-spin" />}
      />
    )
  }
  if ('error' in output) {return <ErrorCard title="Crypto Snapshots Error" message={(output as any).error ?? 'Unknown'} />}

```

If the variable holding the request context is not named `input` in this scope, replace `(input as any)?.symbol` with the correct variable reference that contains the symbol (e.g., `(toolInput as any)?.symbol`), consistent with how the symbol was previously accessed in this component.
</issue_to_address>

### Comment 4
<location path="src/components/ai-elements/tools/__tests__/weather-tool.test.tsx" line_range="15-24" />
<code_context>
             input: { location: 'London', days: 3 },
             output: {
                 data: {
+                    current: {
+                        temp_c: 20,
+                        condition: {
+                            text: 'Partly cloudy',
+                            icon: '//cdn.weatherapi.com/icon.png',
+                        },
+                        humidity: 65,
+                        wind_kph: 12,
+                    },
+                    location: {
+                        name: 'London',
+                        country: 'UK',
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (testing):** Extend the test to assert that the newly added `current` and detailed forecast fields are actually rendered/used by `ForecastView`.

The fixture now includes `current` (temp, condition, humidity, wind), a richer `location`, and `mintemp_c`/`maxtemp_c` for each `forecastday`, but the test still only checks the basic forecast behavior. Please add assertions that `ForecastView` renders:

- Current temperature and condition text/icon
- Location name (and, if used, country / local time)
- Min/max temps per forecast day in addition to `avgtemp_c`

If the component has fallback behavior when these fields are missing, add a separate test with a minimal response to cover those edge cases as well.

Suggested implementation:

```typescript
            input: { location: 'London', days: 3 },
            output: {
                data: {
                    current: {
                        temp_c: 20,
                        condition: {
                            text: 'Partly cloudy',
                            icon: '//cdn.weatherapi.com/icon.png',
                        },
                        humidity: 65,
                        wind_kph: 12,
                    },
                    location: {
                        name: 'London',
                        country: 'UK',
                        localtime: '2023-01-02 12:00',
                    },
                    forecast: {
                        forecastday: [
                            {
                                date: '2023-01-02',
                                day: {
                                    avgtemp_c: 22,
                                    mintemp_c: 16,
                                    maxtemp_c: 24,

```

I can only see the fixture portion of the test file, not the tests themselves. Below is how you should extend the tests around this fixture to fully implement the requested behavior.

Assuming there is an existing test that verifies the basic forecast rendering (something like `"renders weather forecast"`), update it along these lines:

```ts
it('renders current conditions and detailed forecast for 3 days', async () => {
  // Arrange: however you currently invoke ForecastView + tool call
  render(<ForecastView /* props as in existing test */ />);

  // Act: wait for the API-driven content to appear (reuse your existing waitFor/findBy...)
  // e.g.:
  const londonHeading = await screen.findByText(/London/i);

  // Assert: location info
  expect(londonHeading).toBeInTheDocument();
  // If the component renders country/localtime, assert them as well:
  expect(screen.getByText(/UK/)).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(screen.getByText(/2023-01-02 12:00/)).toBeInTheDocument();

  // Assert: current conditions
  expect(screen.getByText(/20\s*°?C/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(screen.getByText(/Partly cloudy/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

  // If the icon is rendered as <img>, assert its src/alt; adjust to actual implementation:
  const iconImg = screen.getByRole('img', { name: /Partly cloudy/i });
  expect(iconImg).toHaveAttribute('src', expect.stringContaining('cdn.weatherapi.com/icon.png'));

  // If humidity and wind are shown:
  expect(screen.getByText(/65\s*%/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(screen.getByText(/12\s*(kph|km\/h)/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

  // Assert: per-day forecast, including min/max + avg
  // Adjust selectors to how dates/temps are rendered in your component.
  expect(screen.getByText(/2023-01-02/)).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(screen.getByText(/22\s*°?C/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); // avg
  expect(screen.getByText(/16\s*°?C/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); // min
  expect(screen.getByText(/24\s*°?C/i)).toBeInTheDocument(); // max

  // Repeat or generalize for other forecast days if present in the fixture.
});
```

Then add a separate test that covers fallback behavior when the new fields are missing. Reuse your existing test helpers/mocking approach:

```ts
it('gracefully handles minimal responses without current conditions and detailed temps', async () => {
  // Arrange: mock the tool/API to return a minimal response:
  mockWeatherApiResponse({
    data: {
      // no current
      location: {
        name: 'London',
      },
      forecast: {
        forecastday: [
          {
            date: '2023-01-02',
            day: {
              // only avgtemp_c, no min/max
              avgtemp_c: 22,
            },
          },
        ],
      },
    },
  });

  render(<ForecastView /* same props as main test */ />);

  // Act
  await screen.findByText(/London/i);

  // Assert: still renders basic forecast
  expect(screen.getByText(/2023-01-02/)).toBeInTheDocument();
  expect(screen.getByText(/22\s*°?C/i)).toBeInTheDocument();

  // Assert: does NOT break if current/min/max missing
  // Depending on your fallback UI, this may be "N/A", hidden sections, or similar.
  // Example if you hide them:
  expect(screen.queryByText(/Partly cloudy/i)).toBeNull();
  expect(screen.queryByText(/Min/i)).toBeNull();
  expect(screen.queryByText(/Max/i)).toBeNull();
});
```

Concretely, you will need to:

1. Locate the main forecast-rendering test in `weather-tool.test.tsx` and:
   - Update its description to reflect that it also checks current conditions and detailed forecast.
   - Add assertions like the ones above for:
     - Location name (and country/localtime if rendered).
     - Current temperature, condition text, and icon.
     - Min/max temps per forecast day, in addition to `avgtemp_c`.

2. Add a new test case in the same file that:
   - Sets up a minimal mock response (no `current`, only `location.name`, and only `avgtemp_c` per day).
   - Renders `ForecastView`.
   - Asserts:
     - The component still renders the location and basic forecast.
     - The absence (or fallback UI) of current conditions and min/max temperatures without throwing errors.

3. Ensure your new test uses the same mocking helpers / patterns already in this file (e.g., whatever you use to stub the Weather API/tool response and to render `ForecastView`), and update import lists if you add new testing-library matchers (e.g., `toHaveAttribute` from `@testing-library/jest-dom` is likely already configured).
</issue_to_address>